Responsible investments

A good start for a better business

The interest in responsible investments is strong and has grown significantly over the past decade. Based on dialogues with more than 60 leading European asset owners and managers, this white paper highlights the importance of responsible investments, the challenges investors face and what is needed to take the next step forward.

Authors: Christian Lindell, Mikael Karlsson & Helena Wickström

Share

Content

Introduction

The interest in responsible investments is strong and has grown significantly over the past decade. There are many strategies and methods to work with and Axholmen’s view is that the level of ambition varies widely among investors. While the top level is continuously being raised, there is still no bottom level and many investors still have a lot to do. Based on dialogues with more than 60 leading European asset owners and managers, this white paper highlights the importance of responsible investments, the challenges investors face and what is needed to take the next step forward.

 

Responsible investments – A good start for a better business

WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE INVESTING?


Responsible investments (RI) implies that investors consider environmental (E), social (S) and corporate governance (G) factors in their investment decisions and are active owners working to influence companies to improve their sustainability performance. The amount of responsibly invested capital has grown rapidly over the past decade, up to 30% per year, and the share of capital managed with some form of RI methodology represented 30% of professionally managed capital in 2014 (Eurosif, 2014). The share is significantly higher in Sweden, which is often seen as a leading country globally.

 

WHY ARE INVESTORS FOCUSING ON RI?


Investors’ primary objective is to achieve healthy risk-adjusted return and there are several reasons why investors focus on RI:

  • Perception that RI contributes positively to risk-adjusted returns through analysis of material risks and opportunities related to corporate sustainability performance. RI enables better investment decisions through more comprehensive information, which affects long-term returns. In this case, RI is part of the investor’s primary mission.
  • Awareness that lack of RI may pose risks to the investor itself, e.g. damaged reputation or poor financial performance.
  • Aim to combine values and investment philosophy within E, S and G, e.g. contributing to a better environment by excluding fossil fuel companies.

Regardless of motive, the objective for responsible investors is to use invested capital to influence businesses to operate more sustainably.

“It makes no sense to invest in companies that undermine our future”
Desmond Tutu

 

HOW ARE INVESTORS WORKING WITH RI?


ESG considerations can be addressed in different ways and investors often use multiple strategies to achieve the desired sustainability impact and returns. There are three overarching approaches:

  • Exclusion of companies that violate international standards and conventions or operate in certain industries or geographies.
  • Inclusive selection of companies that are successful in their sustainability efforts, e.g. best in class, working in sustainable industries or have an offering that aims to disrupt industries towards sustainable development.
  • Active ownership through voting and direct contact with companies to influence change on ESG issues.

 

LEVEL OF AMBITION DRIVES THE AMOUNT OF CAPITAL


The amount of capital that can be classified as responsible depends on the level of ambition and decreases as compliance requirements increase, see Figure 1. UNPRI sets relatively high standards and includes the investor’s total capital regardless of if it is responsibly invested or not. Therefore, by many, UNPRI’s requirements for RI are not considered practical enough.

Mandatory ESG integration, a more concrete definition, means that ESG factors always are included in investment decisions, but there is no requirement as to what or how much information should be included. Despite this, only 1% of assets under management are covered by this definition.

Source: GSIA Global Sustainable Investment Review 2014, UNPRI, Eurosif European SRI Study 2014 Figure 1: Invested capital 2014 (EUR billions) for selected responsible investments definitions

 

IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES AND ACTIONS


Despite the progress in the field of RI, a lot remains to be done. Axholmen, in dialogue with more than 60 leading European asset owners and asset managers, has identified three key actions to take RI to the next level.

Increase transparency. There is a general lack of transparency in asset management, making it difficult for asset owners to distinguish the level of ambition and capabilities of asset managers. RI is differentiating for asset managers and marketing does not always show what is actually being done and it is often difficult for asset owners to determine what they are getting in terms of actual RI work. The information gap needs to be reduced, which requires improved monitoring through ongoing ESG reporting from asset managers to asset owners.

Encourage ambitious alternatives. Ambitious RI processes cost both time and money to implement. Ambitious asset managers need to be rewarded and given the opportunity to make their work visible to asset owners. Various benchmarks, such as the Morningstar Sustainability Rating, play an important role here. However, the transparency of the parameters on which the rankings are based needs to be improved so that more investors can see the benefits of these benchmarks.

Establish a quality-assured minimum level of RI. Successful actors, often with the necessary resources, are continuously improving and raising the bar. However, there is no concrete minimum level, and many investors are at the beginning of their RI journey and need to be given the opportunity to work cost-effectively on RI. By working together, asset owners can align interests and put higher demand on managers’ RI processes, analysis and work as active owners to drive real change.

Summary

Despite strong development in the RI field in recent years, and investors continuously refining their RI strategies, a lot remains to be done. Many investors have only recently started their RI journey and there is a large gap between leading and non-leading players in terms of ambition and competence.

The wide variation, combined with a lack of transparency, means that we see great potential for the entire industry move forward at a faster pace. This can be achieved by giving all players, large and small, the right conditions. Possible initiatives include additional transparency tools, continued benchmarking, and a quality-assured baseline, e.g. through independent auditing and quality assurance of RI work and ongoing reporting between asset managers and asset owners.

Read more about how we can help your company

Want to know more? Contact responsible partner

Feel free to contact us for more information or to book an unconditional meeting

    About Axholmen

    Read our Whitepapers

    Category strategy – a fundament for sourcing to create value

    The concept of category management in procurement is not new and has been developed and adopted by companies worldwide since the late 1980s, yet for various reasons a large percentage of companies fail to realise the full potential of category management. Developing a category strategy is one of the most important tools for companies to identify and deliver on their purchasing objectives.

    Read more